INTRODUCTION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION
Section 60 of the Criminal Code of Canada provides protection for individuals who, in good faith, criticize the government, point out errors or defects in the administration of justice, and seek lawful means to bring about change or remove matters causing hostility.
SECTION WORDING
60. Notwithstanding subsection 59(4), no person shall be deemed to have a seditious intention by reason only that he intends, in good faith, (a) to show that Her Majesty has been misled or mistaken in her measures; (b) to point out errors or defects in (i) the government or constitution of Canada or a province, (ii) Parliament or the legislature of a province, or (iii) the administration of justice in Canada; (c) to procure, by lawful means, the alteration of any matter of government in Canada; or (d) to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters that produce or tend to produce feelings of hostility and ill-will between different classes of persons in Canada.
EXPLANATION
Section 60 of the Criminal Code of Canada acts as an exemption to the sedition charges that an individual may face under subsection 59(4). The section declares that an individual cannot be accused of having a seditious intention solely based on their purportedly misguided actions, so long as they acted in good faith when doing so. There are four specific cases where an individual may act with the intention that is supposedly seditious, but still not face charges thanks to section 60. Firstly, if someone intends to show that a person in a seat of power has been misled or mistaken in their measures, they will not be charged with sedition. This provision acknowledges that not all decisions made may be correct or beneficial, and people have the right to demonstrate against them. Secondly, individuals are allowed to point out errors or defects in any part of the Canadian government or constitution, including Parliament, the legislature of a province, or the administration of justice in Canada. This ensures that those who can identify any issues or weaknesses, are able to speak out effectively. Thirdly, section 60 permits individuals to undertake lawful means to bring about change in any governmental matter in Canada. This means that they can speak out or create initiatives to alter any aspect of government in the country, so long as their means are within the bounds of the law. Finally, it is permissible to bring to attention matters that produce hostility and ill-will between different classes of people in Canada for the purpose of removing them. Every citizen of Canada is entitled to live in a peaceable and harmonious society which they have the right to protest for. Section 60 ensures that individuals can exercise their right to free speech and expression of opinions and beliefs in a peaceful and lawful way, without fear of being levied with sedition charges, so long as their intentions are good. The provision helps to foster an open dialogue about how the country is governed and how it can be improved, ultimately contributing to the nation's growth.
COMMENTARY
The Canadian Criminal Code is a comprehensive document that outlines the legal framework for criminal offences in Canada. One of the sections within the code, Section 60, deals with seditious intentions and provides important protections for freedom of expression and speech in the country. Sedition is a serious criminal offence that involves attempting to overthrow a government or inciting violence against it. In Canada, Section 59(4) provides that a person may be deemed to have a seditious intention if they express a desire to use force to accomplish a particular goal related to the government. However, Section 60 of the Criminal Code sets out certain exceptions to this rule. Section 60 specifies that a person will not be deemed to have a seditious intention if they intend, in good faith, to do one of the following things: - To show that Her Majesty has been misled or mistaken in her measures - To point out errors or defects in the government or constitution of Canada or a province, Parliament or the legislature of a province, or the administration of justice in Canada - To procure, by lawful means, the alteration of any matter of government in Canada - To point out, for the purpose of removal, matters that produce or tend to produce feelings of hostility and ill-will between different classes of persons in Canada These provisions are designed to protect individuals from being charged with sedition for engaging in legitimate criticism or dissent. They provide a legal framework that recognizes the importance of free speech and the ability of citizens to criticize the government and its policies without fear of retaliation. For example, if a group of citizens were to engage in a peaceful protest against a particular government policy, they would not be deemed to have a seditious intention under Section 60. As long as their intentions were lawful and their actions did not involve violence or force, they would be free to express their opinions and advocate for change. Similarly, journalists and scholars would be protected by Section 60 when providing critical commentary on government policies, laws, and regulations. This protection is essential in a functioning democracy, as it allows for robust public debate and the open exchange of ideas. However, it is important to note that Section 60 does not provide absolute protection for all forms of political speech and activity. If an individual or group engages in violence or uses force to overthrow the government, they would be charged with sedition regardless of whether they claimed to be acting in good faith or with legitimate intentions. In addition, there is always a risk that governments may attempt to use sedition laws to suppress political dissent or criticism. There have been cases in Canadian history where sedition laws have been used to silence political opponents or minority groups. Therefore, it is important to remain vigilant against potential abuses of these laws and to ensure that the protections provided by Section 60 are respected and upheld. In conclusion, Section 60 of the Criminal Code of Canada provides important protections for freedom of expression and speech in the country. These protections recognize the importance of free speech and public debate in a democratic society, and help to ensure that individuals and groups are not unfairly charged with sedition for engaging in legitimate criticism or dissent. However, it is important to remain vigilant against potential abuses of sedition laws and to protect these important rights and freedoms for all citizens.
STRATEGY
Section 60 of the Criminal Code of Canada provides individuals with certain protections when expressing opinions or criticisms related to the government or constitution of Canada. These protections are aimed at promoting freedom of speech and promoting public discourse in Canada. However, it is important for individuals and organizations to understand the strategic considerations that come into play when dealing with this section of the Criminal Code. One of the primary strategic considerations when dealing with Section 60 is the potential legal liabilities that may arise from expressing opinions or criticisms. While Section 60 offers protections for individuals who express their opinions or criticisms in good faith, it is important to keep in mind that if these expressions of opinion cross a line into illegal activity, then individuals may still face criminal charges. Therefore, when considering expression of opinions, organizations should ensure that they do not violate any existing laws. Another strategic consideration is the potential backlash that may arise from expressing controversial or unpopular opinions. While Section 60 offers protections for individuals who express their opinions or criticisms, it does not prevent individuals or organizations from facing criticism or ostracism from society. Therefore, it is important for organizations to be aware of the potential for backlash and to consider the potential consequences before making any such public statements. In terms of specific strategies that could be employed when dealing with Section 60, one approach is to engage in careful and thoughtful communication. This means taking the time to craft messages that are nuanced and respectful, and that seek to promote public discourse rather than simply provoke reactions. Additionally, organizations should be transparent about their intentions and motivations when expressing their views or criticisms, and to take steps to avoid any behaviour that may be seen as threatening or hostile. Another strategy is to leverage social media and digital marketing tools to disseminate messages. Social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn allow organizations to reach wide audiences with relative ease. By using these tools strategically, organizations can increase their profile and influence in the public sphere, and promote public discourse and change. Overall, the strategic considerations that come into play when dealing with Section 60 of the Criminal Code of Canada require careful thought and planning. By understanding the potential legal liabilities, backlash, and opportunities for communication, organizations can navigate this legal framework effectively and positively contribute to Canadian society.
CATEGORIES