INTRODUCTION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION

This section defines the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the event of armed conflict.

SECTION WORDING

7.(2.02) For the purpose of subsection (2.01), "Convention" means the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, done at The Hague on May 14, 1954. Article 1 of the Convention is set out in the schedule to the Cultural Property Export and Import Act.

EXPLANATION

Section 7(2.02) of the Criminal Code of Canada refers to the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, which was signed in The Hague on May 14, 1954. The purpose of this section is to define the term "Convention" for the purpose of subsection (2.01) of the Criminal Code. Subsection (2.01) of the Criminal Code deals with offences committed against cultural property during armed conflicts. Article 1 of the Convention is set out in the Schedule to the Cultural Property Export and Import Act. This article defines cultural property and provides guidance on protecting it during armed conflicts. It states that cultural property includes movable or immovable property of great importance to the cultural heritage of every people, such as monuments, works of art, and places of worship. The Convention requires signatory countries to take measures to protect cultural property during armed conflicts and to refrain from using it for military purposes. It also prohibits the theft, pillage, or destruction of cultural property and establishes procedures for the recovery and return of cultural property that has been unlawfully removed. Section 7(2.02) of the Criminal Code of Canada is important because it incorporates the Convention into Canadian law and provides guidance to law enforcement and the justice system on how to deal with offences committed against cultural property during armed conflicts. It ensures that Canada is taking steps to fulfil its obligations under the Convention and to protect cultural property for future generations.

COMMENTARY

Section 7(2.02) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a provision that defines the term "Convention" as it is used in subsection 2.01. This provision is significant because it establishes the legal framework for protecting cultural property during times of armed conflict. The Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, referred to in this section, is an international agreement adopted in 1954 that seeks to safeguard cultural heritage during armed conflicts. The Convention recognizes that cultural property is an important part of the cultural and historical heritage of peoples, and that its protection is essential for the survival of humanity. It defines cultural property as movable or immovable property of great importance to the cultural heritage of every people, such as historical monuments, works of art, manuscripts, books, and other objects of artistic, historical, or archaeological value. The Convention establishes several obligations on states parties. Firstly, it requires them to take all necessary measures to prevent the theft, looting, or wilful damage of cultural property. Secondly, it mandates them to refrain from any act of hostility directed against cultural property, unless the military necessity requires it. Thirdly, it obliges them to respect and protect cultural property located within their jurisdiction, as well as that of other states parties. Finally, it provides a framework for international cooperation for the protection of cultural property. Subsection 2.01 of the Criminal Code of Canada, which Section 7(2.02) refers to, makes it an offence to sell, import, export, or possess cultural property that has been illegally removed from a country that is a state party to the Convention. This provision reflects Canada's commitment to the protection of cultural heritage and to the principles of international law that underpin the Convention. This means that individuals or groups who engage in the illicit trafficking of cultural property can be prosecuted under Canadian law. Furthermore, the Convention is incorporated into Canadian law through the Cultural Property Export and Import Act, which regulates the import and export of cultural property and establishes a system of export permits that apply to certain categories of cultural property. This act provides for the issuance of export permits only to individuals and institutions who have established that the cultural property is not subject to the provisions of the Convention or any other international agreement on the protection of cultural property. It also imposes penalties for the export of cultural property without a permit, as well as for submitting false or misleading information in connection with an application for an export permit. In conclusion, Section 7(2.02) of the Criminal Code of Canada plays an important role in the protection of cultural property during times of armed conflict. By recognizing the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and incorporating it into Canadian law, Canada has shown its commitment to the preservation of cultural heritage and to international cooperation in this regard. This provision is a clear demonstration of Canada's belief that the protection of cultural property is a fundamental right and an essential part of human dignity.

STRATEGY

Section 7(2.02) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a provision that defines the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, which is a critical international treaty aimed at safeguarding cultural artifacts and heritage sites during war or armed conflict. The convention recognizes the need to protect cultural property as a fundamental aspect of human rights, social identity, and historical legacy for future generations. Strategic Considerations 1. Compliance with International Law: The Convention is a cornerstone of international law that outlines specific guidelines and protocols for protecting cultural property during times of war. It is therefore essential that Canada complies with these international obligations and incorporates them into its national legal framework, as outlined in Section 7(2.02) of the Criminal Code of Canada. 2. Preventing Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Property: The destruction and looting of cultural sites is often accompanied by the illicit trading of cultural property. As such, it is important to ensure robust domestic measures and international cooperation to prevent the trafficking and smuggling of cultural property. 3. Preserving National Heritage: Canada has a diverse range of cultural heritage sites and artifacts that are of great importance to the country. Efficient implementation of Section 7(2.02) of the Criminal Code of Canada plays an essential role in protecting Canadian cultural heritage sites and artifacts during times of armed conflict. 4. Protection of Human Rights: The protection of cultural property is not just a cultural matter, but also a human rights issue. The destruction of cultural sites and artifacts can lead to the denial of a community's identity, beliefs, way of life, and fundamental human rights. Therefore, the protection of cultural property is necessary to safeguard human dignity, diversity, and identity. 5. Enhancing National Security: Terrorist organizations often target cultural property as a means of undermining a community's cultural identity and eroding national security. By protecting cultural property, the government can contribute to national security by promoting peace and stability. Strategies that could be employed 1. Implementation of Cultural Property Export and Import Act: The Cultural Property Export and Import Act of Canada outlines the provisions for protecting cultural property within the country. The government can ensure the effective implementation of these measures by conducting frequent audits and inspections of cultural sites and artifacts, especially during times of armed conflict. 2. Establishment of a National Register: Canada can establish a national register of cultural heritage sites and artifacts. This could be used to monitor and manage the country's cultural property to prevent violation during periods of armed conflict. 3. Strengthening National Laws: The Criminal Code of Canada should be strengthened to provide harsher penalties for individuals involved in the theft, damage, and destruction of cultural property during times of armed conflict. 4. International Cooperation: Canada can work with other countries to strengthen the implementation of international conventions and agreements aimed at protecting cultural property during times of armed conflict. This could include sharing intelligence and databases, training and capacity building, and drafting common procedural guidelines. Conclusion Canada must act to protect its cultural heritage sites and artifacts during times of armed conflict. By implementing the necessary legal provisions, strengthening national laws, and strengthening international cooperation, Canada can prevent and mitigate damage to its cultural property. Ultimately, this will help to promote the country's cultural diversity, protect human rights, and contribute to national security.

RELATED SECTIONS